Skip to content
easybpt
Browse topics

Palliative medicine

Ethics, advance care planning and respecting patient wishes

The four principles applied at the end of life, beneficence versus non-maleficence, advance care planning and advance care directives in Australian law, substituted judgement, advocacy, cultural safety for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Māori families, organ donation, and how voluntary assisted dying fits alongside palliative care in 2026.

Tier 1Topic overview

Written with AI assistance and fact-checked against the sources below. For exam study, not clinical decisions. How notes are made

3 questions9 flashcards

At a glance

  • At the end of life the core tension is beneficence versus non-maleficence: will this treatment give the person more than it takes away, given their prognosis and goals?
  • Advance care planning (ACP) is a process of conversations. An advance care directive (ACD) is the signed document that may result. A valid, applicable refusal in an ACD binds clinicians in every Australian state and territory, though Queensland limits when a refusal of life-sustaining measures operates (see below).
  • When a person can't decide, the substitute decision-maker decides as the person would have, not as they themselves would choose.

Loading the rest of the note…

Finished reading?

Test yourself on it:3 questions9 flashcards

Sources

Last updated
14 November 2026
What changed
  • 14 November 2026 Turnstile bot check on sign-in and signed-out feedback

Send feedback

Type of feedback

The page you're on and your device type are attached automatically.